1. I'm not getting mad, you don't know me so you have no idea what gets me mad.
2. It's spelled eradicating and apparently.
3. I never said they shouldn't be bred, that's you putting words where they weren't.
4. Regardless of whether merle's are accepted by the registry will not keep people from continuing to breed them, that's just a fact. Everyone does not follow the rules and standards that we tend to. If someone wants a merle pit that badly, they will be able to find one. Think of how many people don't even register their pits.
ok,i think you understood what i was saying yet you are now resorting to spell checking me, so i assumed correctly that you are frustrated. much of this chat is about how they shouldnt be bred because they are muts and breeding muts for sale is wrong. if you have lost track, merle people are saying they are not muts and should be bred and registered as pure bred and not muts. non-merle people are saying they are not pure therefore not registerable meaning they are not pitbulls therefore should not be bred. you on the other hand say they shouldnt be allowed but you want one. all i was saying is its odd that you would want a merle "pitbull" and agree they shouldnt be bred. why want something that doesnt exist? its wrong to shake your finger at breeders and tell them what they are doing is wrong and then say ill take two. its a double standard. if you want a merle dog, have at it,get a dane or aussie. dont ask for a merle pit though, because aPParently doesnt exist.
