Well, our boy Rocko has a 'PR' bred full blown pedigree (well past 7 generations). Not trying to argue but he has no bully bloodlines (RE, Gotti, Greyline, etc) and when you follow his pedigree back it still leads to some AKC/UKC dogs (Ruffian, Galant, Lylane, Tryarr, etc.) then leads back to just UKC dogs.
A lot of pedigrees do this whether bully or show... the only way to not have this is to have a pure bred game dog like Colby, OFRN, Carver, Boudreaux, etc.
I'm def. gonna call him a pure bred APBT because their is no question about it, although farther in his ped. he does have AKC and UKC. I consider them equal even though they've been separate for so long and one's bred for show the other for working.... they still originated from the same ancestors and neither Amstaffs or APBTs have been mixed with any other breeds to make them different from each other. Basically the AKC used a lot of selective breeding to acheive a show dog.... UKC did selective breeding to produce a game/working dog.... even if you breed the two together, they are still of the same lineage.
As for lying on pedigrees that's always unacceptable and their is really no way to proove it.... I would just like someone to actually be able to find proof... such as literally pointing out the flaw in a pedigree backed up by prooven records or other forms of proof, etc.
Be the first person to like this.